HomeChatAbout

Accessing auranos.org from the UK

Greetings to the people of the United Kingdom

(from Auranos.org)

We have detected you are accessing auranos.org from the United Kingdom

The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) entered into force in the United Kingdom in 1976, eight years after this treaty was signed by the United Kingdom and it's international treaty partners, agreeing to protect the civil and political rights of all the people in the respective jurisdictions of the 174 countries where the treaty guarantees the civil and political rights of the people who live in those countries.

Under a pretext presented by the regulated media of United Kingdom to protect children from pornography and internet sites which promote self-harm the United Kingdom has unlawfully derogated from the treaty without declaring any emergency. The parliament of the United Kingdom and those who enforce the new Online Safety Act 2023 are not only in breach of international law, and acting against the will of the high contracting party for the United Kingdom but are an extant threat to the certain civil and political rights of all the people in the United Kingdom whom the high contracting party for the United Kingdom has internationally declared a will to protect.

Article 17

1. No one shall be subjected to arbitrary or unlawful interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to unlawful attacks on his honour and reputation.

2. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.


Article 19

1. Everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference.

2. Everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice.


Providing Service to People in the United Kingdom under this Regime

While auranos.org and those in association with it have full respect for the rights and dignities of the people of the United Kingdom, some of us are faced with threats of personal economic sanctions and potential imprisonment should we provide service to the people of the United Kingdom in the same way we would to anyone else without any discrimination on a basis of nationality.

We find ourselves in a situation where we are compelled by the new laws of the United Kingdom to break the laws of the United Kingdom by discriminating against the people of the United Kingdom. Given that there are 173 partners to the ICCPR who remain committed to protecting the privacy and freedom of expression amongst the people of their respective countries, and the United Kingdom has unlawfully derogated from the treaty by enacting this new law, we have decided it would be in the best interests of all the worlds people and the people of the United Kingdom specifically to make their own choice as to whether they wish to unofficially derogate from the new law of the parliament of the United Kingdom and be treated as human beings with the same rights and dignities as anyone else.

The New Laws

The new laws impose a legal threat against us if we do not carry out some investigation to deterfind the identity of anyone from the United Kingdom who uses the website. The pretext is that the user could be a child and that the website could be deemed to contain harmful content by those who advocate for the abolition of the rights of the people of the United Kingdom and have a vested interest and history of suppressing free speech and engaging in false information campaigns with impunity. The information on this website and the community which forms here could be considered "harmful to children" by those that the content of the website exposes. We obviously do not vouch for the veracity of what such people would construe as "harmful to children".

Videlicit

The regulated media of the United Kingdom continues to promote and/or discourage public concern about the following subject areas which affect both children and adults and will have serious consequences for the future that the children of the United Kingdom will inherit.

  • Surveillance Apparatus serves to protect the UK from crime but the definition of what constitutes a crime has been turned on it's head when an old lady having her handbag stolen is considered by law enforcement to be a "civil matter" and a person caught vaping in a bus shelter regarded to have committed a "criminal offence".
  • There are now precedents where people have been accosted by law enforcement and even suffered legal penalities for the actionless activity of prayer. At the same time, those declaring an ability to telepathically communicate with god using their mind, either by speaking to god through prayer or hearing the word of god through meditation have been derided as delusional by those who advocated for the belief in the UK regulated media and a rejection of the traditional beliefs about the mind held by faiths throughout the world, including Anglican christianity which is headed by the King of England, the Head of State of the United Kingdom.
  • Those using the pretext of protecting children from harmful content online have been silent about the regulated media of the UK discouraging public concern about the introduction the practice false described as "suicide clinics". The traditional definition of suicide being that the victim of such a killing, kills themself but in any context where there are there those who assist in the killing who are not themselves the victims, these people are not traditionally considered to have committed suicide, but murder. These are definitive descriptions recognised in the common law of the United Kingdom which have been turned into a needlessly murky obfuscation by those who proclaim an interest in protecting people from harmful content online but have nothing to say against malfeasant doctrines across the UK media and the political circuits they control.
  • European Integration was carried out in clear disregard for the will of the people of the United Kingdom who were never permitted a say on this process until the 2016 "BrExit" referendum. The referendum demonstrated that it remained the will of the people of the United Kingdom to remain a sovereign country but also that the UK regulated media had lied about the levels of support for European Integration while hugely promoting it for over two decades and at the same time impugning the reputation of any who were pointing out that the democracy of the United Kingdom had become irrelevant. When the result of the referendum was announced, the same parties wishing to censor the internet openly declared that referendums are not legally binding and those who had committed treason against the democracy of the UK by overwhelming its parliament with a foreign power remain at large to this day and have much they need people to stop talking about. Auranos.org is a dark corner of the internet but we are no threat to children, if anything, the information and people you find here hope to liberate children and adults alike from the mind control of propaganda and censorship that those truly harmful the children of the United Kingdom need in order to maintain the illusion that they deserve the reputations they have on the UK regulated media, whereas in the dark circles their unholy electonic god would cast us so called "conspiracy theorists" to, these people of reknown are considered to be of ill repute.
  • Slavery and servitude are back on the menu but not for the supporters of the minions of those who wish to censor our views from the people of the United Kingdom. In the United Kingdom, propagandists use the phrase "Gig Economy" to describe a state of affairs where people are expected to work without having proper employment rights. The false information in the media suggests that this is a state of affairs which happens to "other people" like the people who arrive on the shores of the UK in rubber dinghies constantly pushed on the UK regulated media but the reality is that agency workers are people from the UK and they are expected to work as second class employees where the official story that they have the same rights as first class employees is simply a lie that everyone in the UK workplaces knows all about. Those without employment rights are compelled to pay into what is called a "company pension scheme" by an automatic opt-in imposed by the UK upon employers. The pension schemes are far from guaranteed to remain solvent and even if they do, the investment forcibly made by workers is such that after the pension matures, the workers end up only getting the same money that was taken from them over decades after it has been adjusted for inflation. The "company pension schemes" declare the investment to double over a period of twenty years thanks to the employer contributing toward it, but given inflation and the way the value of money falls to half its value over two decades, without the contribution from the employer, the employee, ends up getting less value back from these schemes than what the employee put in and with the employers contribution, never gets a greater yield than that neccessary to retain parity with the rate of inflation. These pension schemes are not guaranteed to remain solvent by the time the worker is old enough to collect from them. Its legally impossible to not opt into the schemes and it is legally and diplomatically complex to opt out of them. These wage garnishments are a servitude over the lives of the people of the United Kingdom which cannot at the current time be said to be acting in full compatibility with the high contracting party for the United Kingdom or the democratic will of the people of the United Kingdom
  • The welfare system of the United Kingdom, created even prior to the signing of the International Covenants has become a mechanism to force the people of the United Kingdom to accept any working conditions which are available. This can include serious threats to health and safety as well as being forced by the threat of starvation or resort to common law crime to accept immoral situations such as acting as part of the supply chain to the various forms of genocide which have come to be promoted by the kinds of people who need the people of the United Kingdom to turn a blind eye to what have been described in documents the United Kingdom have in history subscribed to, to be "crimes against humanity". The welfare system no longer supplies those who cannot find adequate employment in an increasingly exploitative and dangerous jobs market but threatens hunger and homelessness on those who do not accept almost any conditions which become available.
  • Corporations which have lent their support to violations of the Nuremberg Code are being given special status to expand their market share in the United Kingdom and this not only includes muedical businesses but also businesses which played a role promoting the uptake of Covid-19 vaccines which proved to be completely ineffective after the lateral flow and PCR medical experiments were carried out on those who took "vaccines" demonstrating that the so called "vaccines" had not vaccinated anyone at all. The so called "vaccines" pushed by these drugs pushers as being 100% "safe and effective" proved not only to be ineffective where they had to change what they meant by efficacy later, but also proved to be unsafe as significant numbers of people who were subjected to the experiment medical procedures suffered life long chronic conditions, with some even suffering death. The propaganda of the media promoting the medical experiments and the censorship of all negative information about the vaccines, including the cenosrship of those who suffered chronic illnesses as a result of the vaccines, meant that the injections happenned in circumstances which made compliance with the Nuremberg Code impossible.
    The advocates of censorship and propoganda have little substance when they loudly declare that the Nuremberg Code is not applicable to the Covid-19 vaccinations but can never be drawn to explain how they could reasonably hold such a view given what is unambiguously written in the Nuremberg Code in regard to those who were subjected to these experimental vaccines under the delusions manufactured by UK regulated media's propaganda promoting the vaccines, and its censorship about the dangers and sometimes lethal side effects. The first paragraph of the Nuremberg Code makes it clear that when people were banned from going on holiday, meeting their family or going to football matches, concerts or any form of socialisng without a vaccine that the following recommendation of the Nuremberg Committee was renounced by those who committed crimes against humanity in 2020. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.

Those who have committed into the law of the UK, their personal desires to censor freedom of expression and compel websites to collect private data on people from the United Kingdom who participate in such websites, do not have a great track record of protecting anyone's human rights and are emotionally terrorising parents that their children will be harmed if the human rights of their own children are not set aside in order to create a circumstance where those committing crimes against humanity with impunity can enjoy a situation where no one in the United Kingdom can talk about it, not only to children but also to their fellow adults.

This has severe consequences not only for the adults in the United Kingdom but will also seriously affect the children of the United Kingdom who will be compelled to live in a propaganda bubble manufactured by those promoting the use of suicide clinics, abortion clinics, homosexualisation, amongst more concealled forms of genocide, while at the same time bombarding the minds of the public with sensational information about sensational wrongdoings from fictional portrayals of enemy governments overseas. We do not believe that any human rights will be protected by annhialating them and those advocating for them and we believe the best means to protect children from the internet is the same wise advise about not letting children play on roads. The very people pushing for the uptake of the internet by children, are the very same people who want to use those children as a weapon of war to censor it.

Auranos.org Policy in Regard to the United Kingdom

We are obviously scepital that the purpose of the new laws are to protect children. We believe the new laws to be direct affronts to the democracy of the people of the United Kingdom and an unambiguous violation of the treaty commitments of the United Kingdom to ensure its people are protected from crimes against humanity and have an absolute right to speak out against such outrages. The United Kingdom has declared no derogation from international law in regards the covenants it has made to protect the rights of humanity on its territory, and at the same time has enacted a law which is a flagrant breach of its legal obligations under the various international covenants.

So "the law", as far as the United Kingdom is concerned, has become a gray area. If we obey the law of the United Kingdom when providing service to the people of the United Kingdom, we break not only the law of the United Kingdom by discriminating on the basis of nationality, but also international law by violating the rights of human beings described in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. While such outrages against humanity continue in the United Kingdom, we have adopted a strategy of letting the individual decide whether or not they themself deserve to have the human rights which their country is agreed they are entitled to, merely because they are human beings, or whether they wish to be treated as law abiding citizens who should be subjected to whatever injuntions upon their rights as a human being that the parliament of the United Kingdom has determinned they are to have imposed on them.

Our approach in this manner is that anyone who considers themself to have the human rights the United Kingdom has since 1976 agreed to protect by the rule of law, must be mature enough to recognise the insult of the newly created laws and those who believe it is right and proper that their own civil and political rights should be set aside under a law that violates the legal obligations of the United Kingdom are entitled to be treated in the way in which they see fit.

We are not unaware that there are those who would wish this new law to be imposed not so much because it affects them but because they desire it to affect their fellow citizens in the United Kingdom, which is to say that they are from the United Kingdom and wholly desire to deprive their fellow people of the most fundamental human rights they have. We do not believe that the choice of those who will to commit crimes against humanity against the people of the United Kingdom should have any bearing on the human rights of anyone else in the United Kingdom. While they may have malicious intent toward their own people in the United Kingdom and conceal this under a hysterical pretext of protecting children (whose rights they would also violate), they will be treated by outselves as mere children, incapable of being a part of our community due to their lack of regard for the fundamental human rights even of their own people.

Your Human Rights Choice

As you seem to be attempting to access auranos.org from the United Kingdom and assuming you have read the above and understand what is entailed in our policy in regard to the discrimination the United Kingdom parliament forces us to commit against you, we provide you, the website visitor from the United Kingdom with the following choice in regard to the Online Safety Act.

Choose one of the following:

I regard myself as a person in the United Kingdom subject to the laws of the United Kingdom, including such laws which violate my rights to privacy and my right to hold, receive and impart freedom of expression. I hereby indemnify auranos.org for the nationalist discrimination it has been compelled to adopt.

I regard myself as a human being, deserving to have my human rights protect by the rule of law and that to whatever extent a government has created laws which violating my rights as a human being, those laws should be diregarded as crimes against me and my fellow human beings across the world.

How does this affect me?

When you click the button to make your decision, we will deem you to have the understanding you declare yourself to have and will be granted whatever access to the website that you yourself deem suitable for yourself. You're decision will not affect anyone else in the United Kingdom, albeit that if enough people place their humanity above their nationalism, it could be used as evidence for a judicial review and potential international proceedings against those who attempt to violate in the internationally protected rights of the people of the United Kingdom.

If you opt to be treated in whatever way those who would enforce this new law would have you treated, you will not be affected, except to say that you will be discriminated against due to the policies of those who would enforce this new law. While we are technically violating your human rights by discriminating against you on the grounds of nationality, we have the lawful excuse that the United Kingdom forced us through the threat of economic sanctions and potential imprisonment to engaged in this act of discrimination and we are not ourselves happy at being forced to violate your fundamental human rights. You will continue to see the website as anyone else in the United Kingdom would, which is to say that the website will have limited functionality.

If you have opted to have your humanity placed above the laws of the UK government which has a legal obligation to protect you from the kinds of activities it is now engaged against you with, then you will be treated as human being with all your human rights intact and your affirmative choice for us to diregard laws which violate your privacy and freedom of expression will indemnify us from making this decistion for you. It is our preference that you should have your human rights protected by the rule of law as a person in the United Kingdom but unfortunately the circumstances are such that we either violate the law against national discrimination or we violate the this new law. Either way, we will be potentially be perceived as being in breach of the laws of the UK parliament and we have opted to have a policy which is in line with what we consider to be morally right and consistant with the policies of all the other governments around the world which have adopted the various international covenants which outlaw legislation such as the Online Safety Act 2023 from being made.

UK Government Agencies and Associated Persons

If you are operating on behalf of the UK, its agencies, partnerships or contractors or to all intents and purposes act as an agent of the UK, you are operating on behalf a party which is in significant debt to the founder of this website. The founder is prepared to enter into negotiation regarding this US run website upon the cognisense of the party in debt to the founder demonstrating they are willing to take responsability for the debts of the UK to the founder. We cannot consider just anyone who holds a position in a government agency, or one of its contractees to have be a responsible party for the United Kingdom without them having first taken responsability for the debts owed by the United Kingdom to the founder.

These debts have arisen through a series of collaborative and collusive human rights violations which directly violate several international treaties the United Kingdom has entered into covenant by. The United Kingdom, has at the time of signing and ratifying these treaties, agreed to provide the founder prompt and effective remedy, redress and reparation for any and all human rights violations which the founder has experienced within the United Kingdom and most especially when such crimes have been committed against the founder by those working in or on behalf of a public office of the United Kingdom.

The debts due now cannot be paid in promises of tommorrow, nor are the debts measured in the promissory notes of the central bank, but in Sterling Quality Silver. The debt can be paid of in various forms of consideration and this can include promissory notes of the central bank, but the face value of "pounds sterling" will not be regarded as the real value of the currency and the amount of debt which such currency pays off will be determinned by the ability of the currency (or any other consideration) to purchase Sterling Quality Silver at the market value when the debt is paid. Responsable parties authorized to examine the evidence of these debts the UK owes to the founder and pay the debt are reminded that the value of the currency has always fell in relation to silver, such that from the perspective of silver, the UK currency is constantly deflating, albeit from a perspective of the currency, it appears that the value of silver is always inflating in value. The sooner the debt is paid, the less money it will cost.

If you represent the UK, as a government agency, including the judiciary, the legislature, the executive, a non-departmental agency, a statutorily create company, a public-private partnership. a privatised company reliant on a government agency to remain in business, an ageny, contractor or employee operating on behalf of any of these or in any other way, making an approach toward auranos.org or those associated with it, you will not be deemed as authorized to deal in these affairs unless you are authorised to pay the debt or authorised by a person authorised by the UK to look at the evidence of the debt and pay it. Before attempting to contact auranos.org in any official capacity, you must first have someone from the UK contact us and begin the process of paying off the debts which are now due.

Auranos.org is a US based private charity which is associated with people from the United Kingdom. Attempts to approach the website or its founder by anyone acting in an official capacity for the United Kingdom will be treated as hostile and we strongly recommend that any such approach by yourselves should begin by discussing the serious wrongdoings suffered by the founder and what prompt, effective redress, remedy and reparation will look like in a very realistic sense. Any approach which fails to recognise the fundamental human rights of the founder, which have already been severely breached will be treated as the hostile activities of rogue elements engaged in criminal activity or naive agents of such criminally minded people operating against the human rights of the people of the United Kingdom and historically and evidently against the fundamental human rights of the founder.

A Bill of Reparation, which will itemise and describe the evidence held for each and every breach of fundamental human rights against the founder by those in various public offices of the United Kingdom will be provided on that Bill of Reparation, together with the financial costs and debts due for each and every single violation of international law by those declaring their activities to be on behalf of the United Kingdom. Whether the United Kingdom denies responsability for these rogue actors or not, the United Kingdom is liable for these debts in accords to what it has agreed when entering into treaty in regards the the International Covenants which protect fundamental human rights across most of the world. The United Kingdom may declare that the identifiable culprits responsable for the various crimes against humanity the founder has suffered have acted in a criminal capacity but none-the-less has agreed in the International Covenants to redress the injuries which have been suffered by the founder.

No one declaring themself to be acting on behalf of a public office of the United Kingdom will be considered to be authorised to deal with auranos.org or its founder until a party for the United Kingdom demonstrates themself to be responsable for the human rights of the people of the United Kingdom and agrees to make payment on the debts now due.

The Bill of Reparation can be found here. It will be updated as time affords and will be available to the international public including the public in the United Kingdom. Any attempts to have the page taken down will constitute a further human rights breach and the appropriate place of civilised arbitration will be the Human Rights Council, an section of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights which deals with the violations of international treaties the United Kingdom has deposited with the United Nations.

If you believe you are authorised to deal in these matters, there will be a part of the web page on that link whereby you can make an approach toward auranos.org and those associated with it in a manner which will be considered and adequate approach. Bear in mind that all other approaches will be deemed inadequate, inappropriate and potentially hostile and in any such approach the approacher is strongly recommended to start discussion about any matter which the approach may be about by first taking note of the severe human rights concerns of the founder and address a significant amount of space within the approach to expressing recognition that human rights ought to have been protected by the rule of law and were not protected by the rule of law and that outstanding debts to the founder are owed by the United Kingdom due to the founders fundamental human rights described in the International Covenants being systemically collusively violated. If you are just some governement worker trying to weild your power as if you had rights and no responsabilities, then you are advised to stay out of the affairs of our private charity running from the United States and desist from committing domestic and international crimes against the founder and anyone else with connections to the United Kingdom associated with auranos.org.